In-depth Analysis: What happens to Africa without USAID?

Under President Donald Trump’s executive order, U.S. foreign aid was suddenly frozen, shocking Africa and endangering millions of lives by upsetting vital humanitarian initiatives. Many people are wondering what happens to Africa without USAID after the decision to stop practically all U.S. funding for ninety days for a budget review. This decision has had quick and terrible effects.

What is happening so far?

Four days after Trump issued the order, an aid worker in Africa, got an email telling him to immediately halt all activity. His group, which works to stop child marriages and assist underprivileged girls, has mostly depended on U.S. money. Their efforts are in peril right now. “We knew Trump’s ‘America First’ posture meant Africa was not a priority,” added the aid worker. We did not, however, anticipate such a sudden and complete cut-off of relief. We are discussing initiatives with life-saving power. The fallout from this freeze goes much beyond African countries. Local organizations across sub-Saharan Africa are closing their doors since they cannot continue their work without U.S. money. Last year alone, USAID has provided the area with humanitarian aid valued over $6.5 billion. Years of advancement in health, education, and economic growth could be undone by the stop in aid distribution.

Fighting HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis

Millions of HIV-positive Africans have received life-saving antiretroviral treatment from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Now, patients depending on daily medication have an unclear future as stop-work orders issued to clinics and supply lines are disrupted. “People die if you stop this,” said a medical aid worker simply. “That’s as basic as it gets.” Apart from HIV therapy, initiatives against malaria prevention run also under danger. USAID helps numerous African nations distribute life-saving malaria drugs and insecticide-treated bed nets. The abrupt stop of these initiatives could cause an upsurge of malaria infections, especially among children under five who are most susceptible to the parasite.

Another important public health issue, tuberculosis, also runs the danger of returning. Patients treated for drug-resistant tuberculosis have to follow rigorous medical schedules; any disruption could make their treatment useless and help the evolution of even more resistant forms of the illness. “We are talking about countless refugees and other displaced persons, children threatened by malaria, and people who need HIV and tuberculosis treatment, whose care risks being stopped,” a medical humanitarian organization spokesperson stated. “This is a pure humanitarian catastrophe.”

Food Security and Education Raced Against

Beyond health care, USAID has been crucial in supporting educational initiatives all throughout Africa—especially for girls. Many programs center on keeping girls in the classroom, offering free lunches, and guaranteeing access to high-quality instruction. Schools dependent on U.S. aid are finding it difficult to keep their doors open with money unexpectedly cut off. School lunches are often the only assured source of nutrition for millions of youngsters, especially those from underdeveloped or conflict-torn areas. These feeding programs are collapsing without USAID financing, leaving children hungry and making school attendance even more challenging for underprivileged families. The problem also touches food security and agriculture. Many initiatives supported by USAID help small-scale farmers, advance climate-resilient crops, and offer emergency food aid during conflicts and droughs. Food insecurity is predicted to increase with these programs stopped, therefore forcing more families into extreme poverty and malnutrition.

Political and Financial ramifications

Apart from creating an acute humanitarian crisis, the lack of USAID financing affects long-term political and economic aspects as well. For governance initiatives meant to enhance democratic institutions, fight corruption, and advance human rights, many African nations have depended on U.S. assistance. Fragile democracies may backslide without these programs, therefore opening doors for authoritarianism, instability, and discontent. Economically, the loss of aid results in fewer jobs for thousands of individuals employed in industries sponsored by U.S. funding. Many local NGOs and community-based groups run their activities using USAID grants. Mass layoffs and closures now threaten them, aggravating already difficult economic conditions in many areas.

Increased Chinese influence

Furthermore, the abrupt stop in U.S. assistance leaves a power vacuum open for other world entities including China, Russia, and the European Union to probably occupy. Particularly China has been growing its influence over Africa by means of significant infrastructure projects and direct investments. As the United States withdraws from aid pledges, African countries could rely more and more on Beijing for support, therefore altering geopolitics relationships.

A Race Against Time

Humanitarian organizations are running against time to identify other funding sources while the 90-day expenditure assessment is still under way. While others have resorted to European donors and foreign organizations, the sheer amount of USAID’s support makes replacing lost money an enormous difficulty. Those living in refugee camps, children in need of food and education, and patients depending on medical treatment—those most impacted by this crisis—are left in flux, not knowing what the future holds. “We are already hearing from local organizations who have closed their doors and are unsure when or if they will be able to reopen,” said a humanitarian aid worker. “Lives are poised on a knife edge.” The

World Reaction and Future Vision

Pressure from around the world is growing on the United States to change course. Foreign governments and advocacy organizations have denounced the assistance freeze, cautioning that it could cause great suffering and erase decades of humanitarian development accomplishments. Although some exemptions have been granted in response to worldwide indignation, the larger freeze is still in place, therefore putting many programs in flux. How the U.S. government moves following the 90-day evaluation will determine the next actions. Should financing be permanently cut or rearranged such that political concerns take precedence above humanitarian needs, Africa may suffer for an extended length of time. Conversely, should the freeze be lifted and assistance be restored, it might still take months to get local businesses back running and rebuild confidence.

One thing is very evident: inaction has far too high a cost. Africa would suffer most from this unheard-of aid withdrawal without quick intervention; lives lost and progress undone. The world is observing to see whether political calculations will eventually be subordinated to humanitarian necessities.

What are your thoughts, should US close shop or come back?

About The Author